Prediction of Molly Scott vs Sean Lodzki Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Scott vs S. Lodzki

Molly Scott

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

892

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Sean Lodzki

ISR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

892

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Scott 1 - 0 Lodzki

They have played 2 sets in total, with Molly Scott winning 2 and Sean Lodzki winning 0. The last match between Molly Scott and Sean Lodzki was at the Ramat Hasharon, 06-05-2013, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Molly Scott getting the victory 6-2 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Scott	1
Lodzki	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Ramat Hasharon(05-06-13)

Stats

Molly Scott

Sean Lodzki

M. Scott vs S. Lodzki H2H Profile

M. Scott	Stats	S. Lodzki
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
50.00% (26-26)	Career Total W/L	36.90% (31-53)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Scott vs S. Lodzki Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Molly Scott has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Sean Lodzki has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Molly Scott, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sean Lodzki has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Molly Scott has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sean Lodzki has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Molly Scott has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Sean Lodzki winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Molly Scott has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 6/4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 20/21). Sean Lodzki has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/44), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 5/9).
Player level: In the last year, Molly Scott has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Sean Lodzki has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Molly Scott winning 1 times and Sean Lodzki being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Molly Scott winning 2 and Sean Lodzki winning 0.
The last match between Molly Scott and Sean Lodzki was at the Ramat Hasharon, 06-05-2013, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Molly Scott getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Molly Scott has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Sean Lodzki has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Molly Scott has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sean Lodzki has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Molly Scott has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sean Lodzki has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Molly Scott vs Sean Lodzki Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Scott vs S. Lodzki H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Scott	Stats	S. Lodzki
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	3
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Scott Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Ramat Hasharon - 06-05-2013
R1 Sean LodzkiS. Lodzki	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
R2 Carolina BetancourtC. Betancourt	W	6-3 3-6 6-1	Stats
SF Deniz KhazaniukD. Khazaniuk	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
QF Alina WesselA. Wessel	W	6-0 6-3	Stats
Ashkelon - 29-04-2013
R1 Alina WesselA. Wessel	W	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

S. Lodzki Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Ashkelon - 08-10-2018
R1 Amandine CazeauxA. Cazeaux	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Herzlia - 01-10-2018
Q1 Diana NekhoroshevaD. Nekhorosheva	L	2-6 6-2 6-4	Stats
Kiryat Shmona - 18-06-2018
R1 Klaudia WiraK. Wira	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Tel Aviv - 04-06-2018
Q3 Adelina BaraviA. Baravi	L	3-6 6-1 6-4	Stats
Tiberias - 14-05-2018
R1 Shavit KimchiS. Kimchi	L	6-2 2-1 ret.	Stats

View All

M. Scott vs S. Lodzki Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Scott	Stats	S. Lodzki
50.00% (26/26)	YTD Win/Loss	36.90% (31/53)
49.55% (55/56)	Sets Win/Loss	38.33% (69/111)
51.60% (483/453)	Games Win/Loss	45.13% (672/817)
48.78% (20/21)	Hard Win/Loss	37.14% (26/44)
60.00% (6/4)	Clay Win/Loss	35.71% (5/9)
0.00% (0/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
0	Aces Per Game	0.01
2	Aces Total	4
0.01	Double Faults Per Game	0.1
3	Total Double Faults	76
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
398.08	Average Opponent Rank	227.38
53% (31/58)	1st Serve %	62% (649/1044)
52% (16/31)	1st Serve Win %	55% (360/649)
37% (10/27)	2nd Serve Win %	35% (140/395)
100% (1/1)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (48/119)
27% (11/41)	Return Points Win %	42% (424/1020)
0.00% (0/1)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
35.71% (5/9)	Challenger W/L	0.00% (0/1)
56.76% (21/16)	Futures W/L	37.35% (31/52)
51% (26/51)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	37% (31/84)
50% (2/4)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	60% (3/5)
63% (5/8)	Deciding Set Win %	42% (5/12)
96% (25/24)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (35/29)
4% (25/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (35/6)
7% (27/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	4% (49/2)